touch screen
Does Voting Technology Affect Election Outcomes? Touch-screen Voting and the 2004 Presidential Election
Jump to the Navigation Bar
Does Voting Technology Affect Election Outcomes? Touch-screen Voting and the 2004 Presidential Election
David Card, Enrico Moretti
NBER Working Paper No. 11309
Issued in April 2005
NBER Program(s): LS
POL
---- Abstract -----
Supporters of touch-screen voting claim it is a highly reliable voting technology, while a growing number of critics argue that paperless electronic voting systems are vulnerable to fraud. In this paper we use county-level data on voting technologies in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections to test whether voting technology affects electoral outcomes. We first show that there is a positive correlation between use of touch-screen voting and the level of electoral support for George Bush. This is true in models that compare the 2000-2004 changes in vote shares between adopting and non-adopting counties within a state, after controlling for income, demographic composition, and other factors. Although small, the effect could have been large enough to influence the final results in some closely contested states. While on the surface this pattern would appear to be consistent with allegations of voting irregularities, a closer examination suggests this interpretation is incorrect. If irregularities did take place, they would be most likely in counties that could potentially affect statewide election totals, or in counties where election officials had incentives to affect the results. Contrary to this prediction, we find no evidence that touch-screen voting had a larger effect in swing states, or in states with a Republican Secretary of State. Touch-screen voting could also indirectly affect vote shares by influencing the relative turnout of different groups. We find that the adoption of touch-screen voting has a negative effect on estimated turnout rates, controlling for state effects and a variety of county-level controls. This effect is larger in counties with a higher fraction of Hispanic residents (who tend to favor Democrats) but not in counties with more African Americans (who are overwhelmingly Democrat voters). Models for the adoption of touch-screen voting suggest it was more likely to be used in counties with a higher fraction of Hispanic and Black residents, especially in swing states. Nevertheless, the impact of non-random adoption patterns on vote shares is small.
Would you like an annual subscription to NBER Working Papers? Click
here for more information.
You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format
from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.
Information for subscribers and others expecting no-cost downloads
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
MARC,
RIS,
BibTeX
Publications |
Programs |
Data |
About |
People
Publications:
Main Publications
Page
New This Week
Working Papers
Books
Books in Progress
Older Books Online
Digest
Reporter
Bulletin on Aging & Health
2002 Japan Conference
Historical Bulletins
Free Subscriptions
Paid Subscriptions
Programs:
Program descriptions and members
Working Group Descriptions and Papers
Selected Projects:
Conference on Research in Income and Wealth
Conference on Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
Sloan Science and Engineering Workforce Project
Boston Census Research Data Center
Call for Papers
Submit to WP Series
Data:
NBER Collection
Business Cycle Dates
Latest Business Cycle Memo
New Economic Releases
Selected Sources
Economic Organizations
US Government Agencies
Other Data Collections
Economic Report of the President
Economic Indicators
Congressional Budget Office
OECD Frequently Requested Statistics
About
What we are
Contact us
Non-data Links
Search
Site Map
Help
Employment
Fellowships
Early History
People:
Staff
Researchers
Board
Contact Us
Search via Google:
Login or change your login
разделы
цвет dufour
виные холодильник
мэш
трансперсональный психология
промышленый альпинизм
стеклянный перегородка
красный площадь собор
soflens comfort
промышленный аккумулятор
ariston опт
серверные корпус консольный переключатель
швейцария культура
fag
втулка переходный
флажок настольный
калибровка цвет
гуп ритуал
mobil gargoyle
электрокамин dimplex model magic (sp8)
эмжс
высокотемпературный электроизоляция
компания доминике
телематические служба
золотник 264-27-00
автошкола
индустриальный монитор
лотерея
купить ниппель
купить пароварка
thuraya
калибровка цвет
гостинницы спб
touch screen